What access means
Maps, fare rules, discounts, and rider rights have to be easy to find in the languages people actually use.
A scheduled trip that does not show up is a real barrier, especially for riders with no backup option.
If an agency does not collect or publish key information, the public cannot tell whether the system is serving people well.
What the bill does
Applies to Colorado transit agencies reporting over 1,000,000 unlinked passenger trips per year, divided into two categories:
- Paratransit performance goes on the record: missed trips, denied trips, late pickups, excessively long rides, and call center wait times.
- Agencies must publicly report barriers to access for low-income riders and people experiencing homelessness.
- Agencies publish an annual public report on ridership by line — so anyone can see which routes are being used and which aren't.
- On-time performance and missed trips reported publicly, not just internally.
- Service changes — routes, stops, schedules, frequency — are tracked and reported publicly.
- Large agencies report which fare discounts and passes riders are actually using — a check on whether affordability programs are reaching people.
- Large agencies report top customer complaint categories, making recurring problems visible.
- Fare information and discount eligibility posted online, on vehicles, and at stations — so riders can find it without asking.
- Key rider information translated into any language spoken by 5% or more of riders in the service area.
- Transit maps posted at every rail station, bus station, and BRT stop.
- If an onboard restroom breaks down on a long-haul route, riders must be given an alternate option.
- Everything goes on a public website, not buried in a report to the legislature.
Talking points
Paratransit accountability
- Reporting missed trips, denied trips, late pickups, long rides, on-time performance, and call center performance makes paratransit visible.
- For riders with disabilities, those measures determine whether service works in practice, not just on paper.
- Paratransit riders often do not have a fallback option when a trip fails.
Ridership by line
- Line-level ridership shows where service is actually being used.
- It helps riders, local governments, and lawmakers see where service decisions have the biggest effect.
- Without it, the public cannot easily judge whether service changes match real demand.
Public reporting
- Riders should not need to dig through technical documents just to find basic service information.
- Posting information on each agency's public website makes accountability usable.
- The goal is a rider-facing public page, not a buried compliance exercise.
Language access
- Language access is transit access because people need to understand the system before they can use it.
- Fares, schedules, maps, and rider rights should be available in practical, everyday formats.
Low-income riders and homelessness
- Agencies should explain how they provide reliable access for low-income riders and people experiencing homelessness.
- They should also identify barriers plainly, because unnamed problems do not get solved.
Fare burden and affordability
- Public discussion should include how much fare revenue comes from riders least able to pay.
- That helps test whether fare policy is meaningful revenue policy or simply a burden on low-income riders.
Maps, fares, and discounts
- Riders should not need insider knowledge to know where transit goes, what it costs, or whether they qualify for reduced fares.
- That information should be easy to find online, onboard, and at major stops and stations.
Reliability reporting
- Transit access depends on whether service actually shows up and runs as scheduled.
- Missed trips and weak on-time performance affect work, child care, school, and health care access.
Service changes for access
- Route, stop, schedule, span, and frequency changes determine whether transit is useful in daily life.
- Those changes should be easy for the public to track and evaluate.
Operator restroom access
RTD-Only- Operator restroom access is a basic working condition issue.
- Better operator conditions support retention, safety, and more reliable service for riders.
Fare product utilization
RTD-Only- Agencies should report which passes, discounts, and fare products riders actually use.
- That shows whether affordability programs are reaching people or only existing on paper.
Customer complaints
- Complaints are rider experience data and often reveal recurring failures early.
- Public reporting on top complaint categories helps focus attention on the issues riders raise most.
Data gaps matter too
- If an agency does not collect key information, that gap should be visible to the public.
- A public "not collected" answer helps show where future oversight, policy, or investment is still needed.
Sources
Bill page: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/HB26-1269
Reengrossed PDF: https://leg.colorado.gov/bill_files/113695/download
Key sections cited: 43-1-1702 definitions, 43-1-1703 rider information, 43-1-1704 language access, 43-1-1705 restroom access, 43-1-1706 reporting.